INJ Search

CLOSE


Int Neurourol J > Volume 22(1); 2018 > Article
Chesnel, Charlanes, Hentzen, Turmel, Le Breton, Ismael, Amarenco, and for the GRAPPPA (Groupe de Recherche Appliquée à la Pelvi-Périnéologie de la Personne Agée): Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Elderly Population With Multiple Sclerosis

ABSTRACT

Purpose

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and urodynamic characteristics of urinary disorders in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in a geriatric population with a nongeriatric population.

Methods

This study was conducted retrospectively between 2010 and 2016. Each patient with MS aged 65 and older was matched with 2 patients with MS aged less than 65 in sex, form of MS, and Expended Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Demographic data, urinary symptoms, treatment, quality of life, repercussion of lower urinary tract symptoms on daily life activities and psychological state and urodynamic parameters were collected. Differences between the 2 populations were evaluated using Student test, chi-square, or Fischer tests.

Results

Twenty-four patients with MS aged 65 and older (mean age, 69.8 years) were matched with 48 patients aged less than 65 years (mean age, 49.4 years). Maximum urethral closure pressure was lower in the elderly population than in the nongeriatric population (mean±standard deviation [SD]: 35.6±18.5 cm H<sub>2</sub>O vs. 78.2±52.3 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, P<0.001). In the male population, there was no statistical difference in any other clinical or urodynamic endpoints. In the female population, voiding symptoms was more described in the nongeriatric population (Urinary Symptom Profile low stream: 3.4±3.5 vs. 1.7±2.4, P=0.04), geriatric population had less urinary treatment (P=0.05). LUTS had less impact on quality of life (Qualiveen: 1.4±1.0 vs. 2.1±0.9, P=0.02) on the geriatric population than in the nongeriatric of female MS patients.

Conclusions

Geriatric population of MS has few differences of urinary disorders compared to a nongeriatric population with EDSS, sex, and MS form equal. However, the psychological impact of these urinary disorders is less important in female geriatric population.

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies on multiple sclerosis (MS) showed longer survival times from clinical onset than older hospital-based series with a moderate overall excess mortality compared with the general population (standardized mortality ratio [SMR], 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41–1.55]) [1]. Excess mortality increase after 20 years of disease (SMR, 2.20 [2.10–2.31]) [1]. In clinical practice, we are going to manage more and more MS aging population, without strong knowledge on the specificity of aging with MS [2,3]. On the other side, micturition disorders are frequent in MS, approximately 78% of all MS patients will develop lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) during the disease [4]. Clinical and urodynamic characteristics of urinary dysfunction in MS are well described : urgency, frequency, urgency urinary incontinence are predominant with an estimated prevalence of 37%–99% whereas obstructive disorders are reported in 34%–79% of patients, leading to chronic urinary retention in 25% of patients [5]. Detrusor overactivity (DO) is the major bladder dysfunction with a prevalence of 65% (34%–99%), however 25% of MS patients have detrusor underactivity, 35% (5%–83%) have a detrusor sphincter dyssynergia and 1to 34% have a normal cystometry [5,6].
Otherwise, aging can determine numerous and various bladder dysfunctions [7-10]. Thus, urinary incontinence (urgency and stress urinary incontinence [SUI]) is more frequent in elderly and voiding dysfunction secondary to obstructive lesions in male (benign prostatic hypertrophy) or female (prolapse) can be observed in this population [7-10].
If MS and aging could determine separately urinary disorders, it could be interesting to evaluate in elderly MS if aging modify the typology of clinical features and therapeutic options.
Yet, some studies have demonstrated that age is not an influencing factor on clinical or urodynamic profile but these studies concerned a young population (age range, 35.9–48 years) [11-14].
Thus, clinical and urodynamic profile of LUTS in geriatric population of MS remains unknown. Because of the consequences of LUTS on upper urinary tract, quality of life, mood, social relationship, risk of falling and the prevalence of osteoporosis, falls, comorbidities and gait disturbance in geriatric population of MS, characterization of urinary disorders is important to get an optimum care [2,3,15,16].
The aim of the present study is to compare the clinical and urodynamic characteristics of urinary disorders in a geriatric population with a nongeriatric population of MS patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted retrospectively based on the first clinical and urodynamic evaluation in one day hospitalization in Neuro-urology Department of a University Hospital between 2010 and 2016. For each patient with MS aged 65 and older, 2 patients with MS aged less than 65 years old were matched in sex, form of MS, and Expended Disability Status Scale (EDSS).
Demographic data (body mass index and duration of the MS), urinary symptoms using the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) [17] history of symptomatic urinary tract infection, bladder management (intermittent catheterization, indwelling urinary catheter, or micturition), use of diapers or condom catheter, urinary treatment, quality of life (Qualiveen) [18,19] and repercussion of LUTS on daily life activities and psychological state using a visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected. The following parameters were analyzed: detrusor activity, maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP), detrusor compliance, and cystometric capacity.
Conventional cystometries was assessed in accordance with International Continence Society (ICS) recommendations [20-22].
Statistical analysis was carried out using R 3.2.3 software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org) and R studio version 1.0.136. Differences between the 2 populations of age (elderly or not) were evaluated using Student test for quantitative variables and chi-square or Fischer exact tests for categorical variables.
This study was approved by a local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France II: 00001072). Since it was retrospective and no formalized informed consent was necessary according to the ethics committee, a letter was sent to the patients informing them that their data would be used, unless they contacted the investigators to express their disapproval.

RESULTS

In the elderly population of patients with MS, 24 patients were included and matched with 48 patients MS aged 65 or older. The mean age was 69.8 years old (standard deviation [SD], ±3.2) in the elderly population and 49.4 years old (SD, 9.3) in the less than 65 years old population. The mean EDSS was 6.4 (SD, ±1.2). All the subjects had both spinal cord and brain localization of MS plaques. Duration of MS was significantly longer in the elderly population than in the less than 65 years old population (20 years [SD, ±13.3] vs. 13.4 years [SD, ±9.4], P=0.04).
In the male population, 5 patients aged ≥65 years were matched with 10 patients ages <65 years. The MUCP was lower in the elderly population than in the nongeriatric population (49.3±30.0 cm H2O vs. 136.0±83.4 cm H2O, P=0.02) without difference in SUI (USP SUI: 0.6±1.3 vs. 1.1±3.0, P=0.67). There was no statistical difference in any other clinical or urodynamic endpoints (Table 1).
In the female population, 19 patients aged ≥65 years were matched with 38 patients ages <65 years. Voiding symptoms was more described in the nongeriatric population (USP low stream: 3.4±3.5 vs. 1.7±2.4, P=0.04), geriatric population had less urinary treatment (P=0.05). The MUCP was lower in the elderly population than in the non-geriatric population (33.3±16.1 cm H2O vs. 63.0±25.4 cm H2O, P<0.001) without difference in SUI (USP SUI: 3.6±3.7 vs. 2.9±3.3, P=0.47) (Table 2). In the female elderly population, LUTS had less impact on psychological state (VAS for impact on psychological state: 30.0±31.2 vs. 57.4±29.4, P=0.01), on daily life activities (VAS for impact on daily life activities: 38.2±30.1 vs. 56.7±29.5, P=0.04) and on quality of life (Qualiveen: 1.4±1.0 vs. 2.1±0.9, P=0.02) (Table 2). There was no statistical difference in any other clinical or urodynamic endpoints (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

With equal EDSS, sex, and MS form, geriatric population of male patients with MS has the same urinary disorders and the same impact on quality of life than a nongeriatric population of MS. In contrast, in the female population of patients with MS, voiding symptoms are less prevalent in the geriatric population than in the nongeriatric population, probably due to lower MUCP. LUTS impact less on psychological state, daily life activities, and quality of life in the geriatric female population than in the nongeriatric female population.
In the female population, Hannestad et al. [23] reported similar findings: the prevalence and the severity of incontinence increases with age while the rating of incontinence as a problem remains stable.
According to previous findings, we found that, MUCP is lower in the elderly population than in the less than 65 years old population [23,24]. There is no consensus in the ICS for the definition of intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) [25]. The most commonly studied parameters to determine ISD are Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) and MUCP. Lower values of VLPP (typically <60 cm H2O) or MUCP (<20–30 cm H2O) are commonly used as an indicator of ISD [25]. Without consensual definition of ISD, only value of MUCP was presented in this study. Prevalence of SUI was not different between the 2 populations. These results are not consistent with those observed in general population. Indeed, in general population, SUI increases with aging, and MUCP decreases with age [23,24]. In our geriatric population, stress situation was uncommon because of disability, lack of mobility, and age that could explain the absence of SUI in daily life. Furthermore, the similarity of SUI in the 2 populations could be explained by the detrusor sphincter dyssynergia present in suprasacral damage in MS. This detrusor sphincter dyssynergia could also explain the voiding symptoms in the young female group.

Interest of the study topic

The urinary incontinence in the elderly is a major topic: during the 6th International Consultation on Incontinence held in Tokyo in September 2016, the ICS recommended to focus on LUTS in the frail elderly [26]. The Consultation has defined “frail older persons” as those over the age of 65 with a clinical presentation or phenotype combining impaired physical activity, mobility, balance, muscle strength, motor processing, cognition, nutrition, and endurance (including feelings of fatigue and exhaustion) [26]. MS constitute an additional frailty factor in the elderly population with LUTS. The knowledge of the LUTS typology in this frail elderly population is necessary to an optimum management of the patients.

Limitations of the study

The principal limitation of the present study is its retrospective design; this may generate a selection bias inducing a lack of power. In order to limit this bias, all patients aged 65 or older who underwent a specific one day hospitalization for MS were included. Moreover, the matching of the patients had been randomized. Another limitation of the study is the absence of non-MS control group. We assumed that in the LUTS of old MS patient, one part of these LUTS is related to MS and one other to aging. In order to evaluate the effect of aging on LUTS in a MS population we choose to compare a geriatric population with a nongeriatric population of MS patients. Despite the small number of patients, which is a limit of our study, it is the only cohort which studies LUTS in a geriatric population of MS.
In conclusion, geriatric population of male patient with MS has the same clinical and urodynamic characteristics as nongeriatric population with control EDSS, and form of MS. With few differences of urinary symptoms and urodynamic parameters, the impact of the LUTS is less important in the geriatric female population of MS than in the nongeriatric female patients with MS. Conversely, no change concerning overactive bladder/overactive detrusor was observed while it could be thinkable that age and MS, by means of potentiation of pathophysiological factors, may increase rate and /or severity of overactive bladder in this specific population.

NOTES

Research Ethics
This study was approved by a local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France II: 00001072). Since it was retrospective and no formalized informed consent was necessary according to the ethics committee.
Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION STATEMENT
·Full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis: C. Chesnel, A. Charlanes, C. Hentzen, N. Turmel, F. Le Breton, S. Sheikh Ismael, G. Amarenco
·Study concept and design: C. Chesnel, A. Charlanes, C. Hentzen, N. Turmel, F. Le Breton, S. Sheikh Ismael, G. Amarenco
·Acquisition of data: C. Chesnel
·Analysis and interpretation of data: C. Chesnel, G. Amarenco
·Drafting of the manuscript: C. Chesnel
·Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: C. Chesnel, A. Charlanes, C. Hentzen, N. Turmel, F. Le Breton, S. Sheikh Ismael, G. Amarenco
·Statistical analysis: C. Chesnel, A Charlanes
·Study supervision: C. Chesnel, A. Charlanes, C. Hentzen, N. Turmel, F. Le Breton, S. Sheikh Ismael, G. Amarenco

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank all members of the GRAPPPA (Groupe de Recherche Appliquée à la Pelvi-Périnéologie de la Personne Agée) for their valuable help.
The members of GRAPPPA (Clinical research Group of perineal dysfunctions in older adults): Gerard Amarenco, Xavier Deffieux, Brigitte Fatton, Xavier Game, Rebecca Haddad, Claire Hentzen, Claude Jeandel, Jacques Kerdraon, Pierre Mares, Matthieu Mezzadri, Anne Claire Petit, Benoit Peyronnet, Gilberte Robain, Jean Marc Vetel.

REFERENCES

1. Leray E, Vukusic S, Debouverie M, Clanet M, Brochet B, de Sèze J, et al. Excess mortality in patients with multiple sclerosis starts at 20 years from clinical onset: data from a large-scale French observational study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0132033. PMID: 26148099
crossref pmid pmc
2. Buhse M. The elderly person with multiple sclerosis: clinical implications for the increasing life-span. J Neurosci Nurs 2015;47:333-9. PMID: 26528951
crossref pmid
3. Stern M. Aging with multiple sclerosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2005;16:219-34. PMID: 15561552
crossref pmid
4. Wiedemann A, Kaeder M, Greulich W, Lax H, Priebel J, Kirschner-Hermanns R, et al. Which clinical risk factors determine a pathological urodynamic evaluation in patients with multiple sclerosis? an analysis of 100 prospective cases. World J Urol 2013;31:229-33. PMID: 22227822
crossref pmid
5. Wang T, Huang W, Zhang Y. Clinical characteristics and urodynamic analysis of urinary dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2016;129:645-50. PMID: 26960366
crossref pmid pmc
6. Ruffion A, Castro-Diaz D, Patel H, Khalaf K, Onyenwenyi A, Globe D, et al. Systematic review of the epidemiology of urinary incontinence and detrusor overactivity among patients with neurogenic overactive bladder. Neuroepidemiology 2013;41:146-55. PMID: 23942583
crossref pmid
7. DuBeau CE, Kuchel GA, Johnson T 2nd, Palmer MH, Wagg A; Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Incontinence in the frail elderly: report from the 4th International Consultation on Incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29:165-78. PMID: 20025027
crossref pmid
8. Jung HB, Kim HJ, Cho ST. A current perspective on geriatric lower urinary tract dysfunction. Korean J Urol 2015;56:266-75. PMID: 25874039
crossref pmid pmc
9. Wagg A, Gibson W, Ostaszkiewicz J, Johnson T 3rd, Markland A, Palmer MH, et al. Urinary incontinence in frail elderly persons: report from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2015;34:398-406. PMID: 24700771
crossref pmid
10. McGrother CW, Donaldson MM, Hayward T, Matthews R, Dallosso HM, Hyde C, et al. Urinary storage symptoms and comorbidities: a prospective population cohort study in middle-aged and older women. Age Ageing 2006;35:16-24. PMID: 16234314
crossref pmid pdf
11. Sliwa JA, Bell HK, Mason KD, Gore RM, Nanninga J, Cohen B. Upper urinary tract abnormalities in multiple sclerosis patients with urinary symptoms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:247-51. PMID: 8600866
crossref pmid
12. Koldewijn EL, Hommes OR, Lemmens WA, Debruyne FM, van Kerrebroeck PE. Relationship between lower urinary tract abnormalities and disease-related parameters in multiple sclerosis. J Urol 1995;154:169-73. PMID: 7539859
crossref pmid
13. Giannantoni A, Scivoletto G, Di Stasi SM, Grasso MG, Vespasiani G, Castellano V. Urological dysfunctions and upper urinary tract involvement in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurourol Urodyn 1998;17:89-98. PMID: 9514141
crossref pmid
14. Mayo ME, Chetner MP. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Urology 1992;39:67-70. PMID: 1728799
crossref pmid
15. Sand PK, Sand RI. The diagnosis and management of lower urinary tract symptoms in multiple sclerosis patients. Dis Mon 2013;59:261-8. PMID: 23786660
crossref pmid
16. Dong G, Zhang N, Wu Z, Liu Y, Wang L. Multiple sclerosis increases fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:650138. PMID: 25710014
crossref pmid pmc pdf
17. Haab F, Richard F, Amarenco G, Coloby P, Arnould B, Benmedjahed K, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of bladder and urethral dysfunction symptoms: development and psychometric validation of the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) questionnaire. Urology 2008;71:646-56. PMID: 18313122
crossref pmid
18. Costa P, Perrouin-Verbe B, Colvez A, Didier J, Marquis P, Marrel A, et al. Quality of life in spinal cord injury patients with urinary difficulties. Development and validation of qualiveen. Eur Urol 2001;39:107-13. PMID: 11173948
crossref pmid
19. Bonniaud V, Bryant D, Parratte B, Gallien P, Guyatt G. Qualiveen: a urinary disorder-specific instrument for use in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1661-3. PMID: 17141651
crossref pmid
20. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:167-78. PMID: 11857671
crossref pmid
21. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:261-74. PMID: 11948720
crossref pmid
22. Lose G, Griffiths D, Hosker G, Kulseng-Hanssen S, Perucchini D, Schäfer W, et al. Standardisation of urethral pressure measurement: report from the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:258-60. PMID: 11948719
crossref pmid
23. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S; Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:1150-7. PMID: 11106889
crossref pmid
24. Pfisterer MH, Griffiths DJ, Schaefer W, Resnick NM. The effect of age on lower urinary tract function: a study in women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:405-12. PMID: 16551306
crossref pmid
25. Osman NI, Li Marzi V, Cornu JN, Drake MJ. Evaluation and classification of stress urinary incontinence: current concepts and future directions. Eur Urol Focus 2016;2:238-44. PMID: 28723369
crossref pmid
26. Wagg A, Chen L, Johnson T, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Kuchel G, Markland A, et al. Incontinence in frail older persons. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. 6th ed. Tokyo: International Consultation on Incontinence; 2016. pp. 1309-442.

Table 1.
Comparison of demographic, clinical, and urodynamic characteristics of lower urinary tract symptoms in the male subgroup
Variable Population ≥65 years old
Population <65 years old
Total No. P-value
Value No. Value No.
Age (yr) 68.6 ± 3.2 5 49.4 ± 9.3 10 15 < 0.001
EDSS 6.3 ± 1.4 5 6.3 ± 1.3 10 15 1.00
MS forma) 5 10 15 1.00
 Progressive 4 (80) 8 (80)
 RR 1 (20) 2 (20)
MS duration 13.2 ± 7.8 5 13.8 ± 12.3 10 15 0.91
Body mass index (kg/m2) 26.7 ± 6.3 5 24.0 ± 2.3 10 15 0.41
Qualiveen total 2.0 ± 1.0 4 1.6 ± 1.3 9 13 0.60
USP SUI 0.6 ± 1.3 5 1.1 ± 3.0 9 14 0.67
USP OAB 9.0 ± 2.8 5 7.7 ± 4.9 9 14 0.53
USP LS 3.0 ± 1.9 5 2.7 ± 2.9 9 14 0.80
VAS DLA 60.0 ± 14.1 4 40.0 ± 43.1 9 13 0.26
VAS psy 57.5 ± 9.6 4 36.7 ± 48.0 9 13 0.24
Voiding modea) 5 10 15 0.46
 Catheterization 0 (0) 1 (10)
Symptomatic urinary tract infectiona) 5 10 15 0.25
 Yes 3 (60) 2 (20)
Condom cathetera) 5 10 15 0.23
 Yes 0 (0) 4 (40)
Diapers 2 10 12 0.46
 Yes 1 (50) 2 (20)
Urinary treatmenta) 5 10 15 0.78
 None 3 (60) 4 (40)
 Ach 0 (0) 2 (20)
 Ach and α- 1 (20) 1 (10)
 α- 0 (0) 2 (20)
 α- and ISBT 1 (20) 1 (10)
Detrusor overactivitya) 4 10 14 0.25
 Yes 4 (100) 6 (60)
MUCP 49.3 ± 30.0 3 136.0 ± 83.4 10 13 0.02
Detrusor compliancea) 4 10 14 0.29
 Impaired 1 (25) 0 (0)
Cystomanometric capacity 340.0 ± 71.2 4 372.0 ± 114.3 10 14 0.54

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

EDSS, Expended Disability Status Scale; MS, multiple sclerosis; RR, relapsing-remitting; USP, urinary symptoms profile; SUI, stress urinary incontinence; OAB, overactive bladder; LS, low stream; VAS DLA, visual analogue scale for impact on daily life activities; VAS psy, visual analogue scale for impact on psychological state; Ach, anticholinergic drug; α-, α-adrenergic blocking drug; ISBT, intrasphincter botulinic toxin; MUCP, maximum urethral closure pressure.

a) Fischer exact test.

Table 2.
Comparison of demographic, clinical and urodynamic characteristics of lower urinary tract symptoms in the female sub-group
Variable Population ≥65 years old
Population <65 years old
Total No. P-value
Value No. Value No.
Age (yr) 70.1 ± 3.3 19 49.7 ± 9.4 38 57 < 0.001
EDSS 6.5 ± 1.3 19 6.5 ± 1.2 38 57 1.00
MS form 19 38 57 1.00
 Progressive 14 (74) 28 (74)
 RR 5 (26) 10 (26)
MS duration 21.7 ± 14.0 19 13.3 ± 8.7 38 57 0.02
Body mass index (kg/m2) 27.3 ± 8.2 17 24.0 ± 5.1 38 55 0.13
Qualiveen total 1.4 ± 1.0 17 2.1 ± 0.9 35 52 0.02
USP SUI 3.6 ± 3.7 18 2.9 ± 3.3 36 54 0.47
USP OAB 10.7 ± 4.7 18 10.7 ± 4.7 36 54 0.97
USP LS 1.7 ± 2.4 18 3.4 ± 3.5 36 54 0.04
VAS DLA 38.2 ± 30.1 17 56.7 ± 29.5 36 53 0.04
VAS psy 30.0 ± 31.2 17 57.4 ± 29.4 35 52 0.01
Voiding mode 19 38 57 0.51
 Catheterization 3 (13) 10 (26)
Symptomatic urinary tract infection 19 38 57 1.00
 Yes 10 (53) 20 (53)
Diapersa) 15 38 53 0.47
 Yes 13 (87) 28 (74)
Urinary treatmenta) 19 38 57 0.05
 None 15 (79) 20 (53)
 Ach 3 (16) 7 (18)
 Ach and α- 0 (0) 10 (26)
 α- 1 (5) 1 (3)
 α- and ISBT 0 (0) 0 (0)
Detrusor overactivity 18 38 56 0.66
 Yes 12 (67) 23 (61)
MUCP 33.3 ± 16.1 18 63.0 ± 25.4 38 56 < 0.001
Detrusor compliancea) 18 0 (0) 38 56 1.00
 Impaired 0 (0)
Cystomanometric capacity 308.9 ± 168.9 18 340.8 ± 165.2 38 56 0.51

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

EDSS, Expended Disability Status Scale; MS, multiple sclerosis; RR, relapsing-remitting; USP, urinary symptoms profile; SUI, stress urinary incontinence; OAB, overactive bladder; LS, low stream; VAS DLA, visual analogue scale for impact on daily life activities; VAS psy, visual analogue scale for impact on psychological state; Ach, anticholinergic drug; α-, α-adrenergic blocking drug; ISBT, intrasphincter botulinic toxin; DO, detrusor overactivity; MUCP, maximum urethral closure pressure.

a) Fischer exact test.

TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+
METRICS Graph View
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
  • 5 Scopus
  • 8,423 View
  • 108 Download
We recommend


ARTICLE & ORGAN
Article Category

Browse all articles >

Organ

Browse all articles >

ISSUES
DISEASES & TOPICS
Diseases

Browse all articles >

Topics

Browse all articles >

AUTHOR
INFORMATION

Official Journal of Korean Continence Society & ESSIC (International Society for the Study of BPS) & Korean Society of Urological Research & The Korean Children’s Continence and Enuresis Society & The Korean Association of Urogenital Tract Infection and Inflammation & Korean Society of Geriatric Urological Care
Editorial Office
Department of Urology, Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine,
29 Saemunan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03181, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2001-2237     Fax: +82-2-2001-2247    E-mail: support@einj.org

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Continence Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next