Bilateral Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with Vaginal Hysterectomy for Apical Uterovaginal Prolapse
Kaiyue Wang, Lijuan Shi, Zheren Huang, Yun Xu
Int Neurourol J. 2022;26(3):239-247. Published online 2022 Sep 30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2244076.038
Citations to this article as recorded by 
Nationwide assessment of practice variability in the utilization of hysteropexy at laparoscopic apical suspension for uterine prolapse
Kaily R. Cox, Tanaz R. Ferzandi, Christina E. Dancz, Rachel S. Mandelbaum, Maximilian Klar, Jason D. Wright, Koji Matsuo
AJOG Global Reports.2024; 4(1): 100322. CrossRef
Mobility analysis of a posterior sacrospinous fixation using a finite element model of the pelvic system
Marine Lallemant, Andres Arteaga Shimojyo, Olivier Mayeur, Rajeev Ramanah, Chrystèle Rubod, Yohan Kerbage, Michel Cosson, Jose Manuel Garcia Aznar
PLOS ONE.2024; 19(3): e0299012. CrossRef
Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series
Ye Liu, Chao Wang, Xianjing Wang, Rongrong Yan, Lei Chu, Xinliang Chen
Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparative characteristics of laparoscopic sacrovaginopexy and transvaginal sacrospinous fixation
O.A. Petrenko, N.A. Petrenko, K.R. Bakhtiyarov
Rossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa.2023; 23(3): 64. CrossRef